Skip to main content
HARESEARCH CONSOLE
BlogInternJournal PapersEveryday trust repair: how immigrants in the Nordic region navigate and correct health misinformationBlogNew publication – Cumulative navigation burden in health and social careResearch VisitsUniversity of Sheffield — Invited Research and Staff Mobility VisitBlogPOLINOCULATE - Inoculating and Coaching Policymakers to Resist Disinformation
Portfolio Scholar

Professional Credential

Making Editorial Decisions and Evaluating Peer Reviewer Reports

2026· Springer Nature Editorial Academy· 1 min read ·0 comments ·0 reactions
Return to Professional Development and Credentials
Making Editorial Decisions and Evaluating Peer Reviewer Reports
Authors / roleHamed Ahmadinia
Venue / institutionSpringer Nature Editorial Academy
Date / period2026-12-08
Completed2026-12-08
IssuerSpringer Nature Editorial Academy
VolumeOnline course certificate
Credential verificationOpen verification page

Completed professional editor training through the Springer Nature Editorial Academy on evaluating peer-review reports and making editorial decisions.

Training focus

  • Evaluating peer-review reports
  • Making editorial decisions
  • Handling differing or conflicting reviewer assessments
  • Considering issues raised during peer review
  • Providing constructive editorial feedback

The certificate was awarded on 15 August 2026.

Editorial AcademyEditorial decisionsJournal editingPeer reviewPublication ethicsReviewer reportsSpringer Nature
READER REACTIONS

How did this post land with you?

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

0 comments

Loading comments…

Join the discussion

Your email address is never published. Comments may be held for moderation.

Return to Professional Development and Credentials
© 2022-2026 Hamed Ahmadinia All Rights Reserved